2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College Cardboard, found material, wood, plastic, paint, oil on canvas  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College Animated video, iPod, balsa wood, foam core, cardboard, paint  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College Animated video, iPod Nano, foam core, cardboard, paint  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College Oil on canvas  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College Oil on canvas
 2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College Oil on canvas  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College  2014 Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages, Ithaca College Oil paint on canvas, carboard, wood, tape, latex house paint

Your Rivers, Your Margins, Your Diminutive Villages
Ithaca College, January 2014

The work in this show includes paintings and site-specific multimedia work comprised of drawing, video, and sculptural elements. In a shift from previous work, the scuplture has become the dominant element, with the paintings acting as backdrops or props for other works. Using automatic building techniques, this work responds to the natural environment of Ithaca and the surrounding landscape as a point of departure, moving from hidden waterways and deeply-wooded terrain to manicured gardens and agricultural land. Because the work is generated intuitively, using techniques of Surrealist automatism as a guiding principle, the work often takes unexpected turns and explores the intersecting terrains of landscape, utopian architecture, and bodily organism. This show was created with the generous support of he School of the Museum of fine Arts, Boston, the Constance Saltonstall Foundation for the Arts, and Ithaca College. This work was made with the support of the School of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.

Catalog Essay by Dr Leah Modigliani, Visual Studies Program Director, Tyler University:

The Thin Crust of the World; Patte Loper’s New Landscapes

Set the foot down with distrust upon the crust of the
World– it is thin.
Moles are at work beneath us; they have tunneled the
With separate chambers, which at an appointed knock
Could be as one, could intersect and interlock. We walk
On the skin
Of life…
 Underground System, Edna St. Vincent Millay, 19391
Today when our aspirations have been reduced to a desperate
attempt to escape from evil, and times are out of joint, our obsessive,
subterranean and pictographic images are the expression of the
neurosis which is our reality. To my mind certain so-called abstraction
is not abstraction at all. On the contrary, it is the realism of our time.
Artist Statement, Adolph Gottlieb, 19472

Spoken almost eight years apart by two very different American artists, a celebrated bisexual female poet and a Jewish American Abstract Expressionist, Millay and Gottlieb’s words describe artists’ ongoing struggle to reconcile the real with the surreal. For many artists who lived through the trauma of World War II life seemed untethered to anything concrete. Millay’s image of solid feet walking on the thin “crust of the world,” a “skin of life” that might collapse into subterranean tunnels at any moment syncopates with Gottlieb’s pragmatic acceptance that neurotic abstraction was the new reality for his generation after the war.
Now, in the midst of an electronic information age barely imagined six decades ago, the notion of a neurotic abstraction or an alternative underground network of passages takes on new currency. Human behavior seems unable to keep up with the pace of our own technological developments, and as Marshall McLuhan so presciently theorized, the price paid for such technological precocity may well be trauma and anxiety– like a doctor who is forced to operate on himself without anesthetic, to use one of McLuhan’s vivid examples.3 Many contemporary artists are creating works that express the anxiety of this brave new world, one in which all identities are contingent and the boundaries between natural and unnatural, biological and machine, digital and analog, real and fake are no longer easy to distinguish.4
Patte Loper’s Your Margins, Your Rivers, Your Diminutive Villages is a sprawling group of objects and images constructed out of oil paintings, drawings, found-object assemblages, and short videos that reflects and revels in the collapse of such boundaries. The work was initially inspired both by Loper’s interest in Surrealist automatism and her recent experience as a resident artist at the Millay Colony, where she no doubt unconsciously retraced Millay’s steps around the Steeplechase Estate. In an interview with me Loper recounted a walk through the forest, and how she suddenly became aware of a coyote standing still watching her, and then her disquieting realization that she had been watched for some time.5 For many urban-dwellers who are increasingly distanced from the wilderness, the sudden awareness of oneself as human in the natural environment can be both empowering and terrifying; the rational mind looks for a way to control nature in order to protect the body, but the body becomes animalistic with a heightened sensitivity to the immediate environment that eschews reason.
Indeed, the sense of sight plays a privileged role in Loper’s installation, even as she tries to subvert it through Surrealist-derived automatism. Andre Breton and others associated with Dada and Surrealism in the 1920s used automatism as a tactic to create more authentically subconscious imagery. By writing or drawing without pre-planning, such artists embraced free-association, chance and accident in their compositions with the goal of liberating man’s libidinal desires from society’s confines. Vision was demoted in the search for the unconscious since it had long been associated with Cartesian rational observation, and the goal was to find a deeper truth than that which could be seen through the eyes alone. Perhaps because of this, the image of the eye reoccurs frequently as an important symbol in Surrealist art, such as in Rene Magritte’s painting The False Mirror (1928) and Salvador Dali and Luis Bunuel’s savage eye-slicing close-up in the beginning of their film Un Chien Andalou (1929).
In Loper’s I Have Scarcely Left You two sets of eyes float inside two black sign-like shapes two black sign-like shapes reminiscent of Adolph Gottlieb’s early head-shaped pictograms. The smaller sign hovers over the larger, which stands on two improbable stick legs in the midst of a wooded landscape. This small oil painting is arranged in a group with others that also contain pictogram-type forms layered on top of quickly brushed forest scenes. Because the paintings are placed along the floor, sometimes overlapping each other, it is clear that Loper intends them to exist as one material among many; they do not hold a privileged status as paintings within the greater installation.

At the Residency also reckons with the privileging of optic experience as it relates to landscape painting. In this relief sculpture, a small oil painting of a grassy clearing surrounded by trees is sandwiched between another canvas with its face turned backwards and a small model of a house supported by a rickety scaffolding of hot-glued cardboard and wood. The scaffolding, which also resembles the tripod-mounted easels commonly used by plein-air painters, rises out of a more abstract pile of construction materials (paper, cardboard, wood, tape, glue, plastic) assembled on the floor. The classic window on to the world of representational painting, historically a symbol of the authority of mans’ objective vision, is recast as a duplicitous prop; one artificial landscape of many that are available and exchangeable.

Loper dismantles the painted landscape even further in the largest sculpture in the show, which is provocatively titled Structure for Ruining Paintings (2014). Three tentacle-like conduits grow out of one larger slide-like form mounted high supports. The artist activates the piece in a performance by pouring paint down the highest chute. The viscous fluid travels down through the three delicate channels of cardboard and paper to drip, or pour, onto three canvases placed at the bottom of each conduit on the floor. Each canvas is painted with a forest scene, so the dripping paint, now pure material, works to deface the painted representation of nature with fat blots. Even as this handcrafted Rube Goldberg sort of machine works to ruin Loper’s own paintings, it succeeds in looking much like a branch hanging down and into the gallery space. This irony is perhaps not lost on the artist, who recently expressed her awareness of the absurdity of reinventing the wheel again and again as an artist; “I cannot make an original brushstroke, everything looks like something I’ve seen before.”6
Even when creating new works that are authentically all her own, the overwhelming sense that every gesture has already
been made remains a burden, as it must for all contemporary artists. This unshakable knowledge of the history of art also finds representation in a series of small monuments titled Prototypes for New Heads (2013-2014). These half-dozen
sculptures are made of scrap materials like putty, tape, foam core, wood, and paint, and each rough head form sits on a low pedestal. They also reference early twentieth-century utopian architecture like Tatlin’s Monument to the Third International (1920), geodesic domes, and sets from 1960s science fiction movies. As monuments they are too small, too delicate, too insubstantial; as heads they are blind, not focused, irrational. They seem like children’s models of Brancusi’s birds in flight, somewhat broken, abject in failure, but willing to delight if one overlooks the imperfections.
Indeed there are tiny surprises to be found in and amongst these sculptures. In one of the Prototypes for New Heads a small video screen is nestled into the top of a “head” that looks more like two satellite dishes exploding into each other. Savvy art viewers will recognize the image of American writer Susan Sontag. We hear Sontag telling us that in her view a good life can only be good if it includes doing something for others. French philosopher Gilles Deleuze, arguably one of the darlings of twenty-first century art school education, is found in a small video screen at the top of We Are All Only as Old as Each Other,a large beehive or hoop dress shaped sculpture. Deleuze has, however, been robbed of his lectures on difference and creativity, and is instead heard mouthing the abstract sounds of whale calls. The beehive form indicative of busy work, in conjunction with a title that implies we are all in this together, is provocative when paired with an appropriated image of Deleuze. The sculpture seems to say, “we make, we think, we make, and still we are animal.”
These small videos require viewers to stoop down, put on headphones, and peer into the sculptures that contain them, while other small details in the greater exhibition, like tiny drawings in a corner of the gallery, draw viewers into and around the space. The big windows that line the gallery also work here to remind us of the centrality of our own vision, and over time visitors may realize that from a certain perspective, they too are part of the show. Loper’s small canvas of painted eyes is steadfastly watching, silently whispering, I Have Scarcely Left You. Your Margins, Your Rivers, Your Diminutive Villages as a title most resonates with meaning after walking through the installation and experiencing it from different angles, the artificial landscape offered to us is a reflection of our need to possess and control the uncontrollable. Like Millay, Gottlieb, the Surrealists and countless others who came before, art is an expression of defining and controlling that which is beyond the artist’s limits of understanding. Our margins, our rivers, our making of villages is a symptom of human neurosis that is our reality; the desire to create a world in an image that makes us feel like we are the ones doing the watching. We are safe; the coyote is not in the forest with us unless we want to see it.
1 Edna St. Vincent Millay, “Underground System,” ed. J.D. McClatchy, Edna St.
Vincent Millay Selected Poems (New York: Library of America, 2003),179.
2 Adolph Gottlieb, “The Ides of Art: The Attitudes of Ten Artists on Their Art and
Contemporaneousness,” The Tiger’s Eye 1, no. (Dec., 1947).Accessed online on
Jan 7, 2013: http://gottliebfoundation.org/the-artist/selected-artists-writings/
3 Marshall McLuhan, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man (London:
Routledge, 1964), 6.
4 Acclaimed American video artist Ryan Trecartin may be the poster-child of
this kind of work.
5 Patte Loper, interview by author, Brooklyn, NY, Jan 5, 2014.
6 Ibid.

Bibliography Section Article Bibliography Section Catalog Bibliography Section Web Link PDF icon displayed by thumbnail Sold Dot